|
Katy Citizen Watchdog$ |
|
We’re Taxpayers. It’s Our Money. |
|
Eating In The Cafeteria |
|
Chances are your child eats in the school cafeteria regularly or at least every now and then.
Hopefully during your child’s school career, you’ve gone to the trouble to visit his school during lunchtime to sit with him and eat the same thing he eats. Depending on your personal experience you may or may not like what you had for lunch.
Good nutrition helps your child be a good student.
Once as a parent (when I complained about the nutritional value of what was being served to children) I was asked to be on a KISD committee that went around and ate at various school cafeterias. It was an interesting experience, but was mostly a waste of my time and the administrator who had to escort us around.
No one changed a thing because of the committee. What’s new?
I read with interest the Houston Chronicle [See http://www.chron.com/content/archive/ysearch.mpl?query=%27Schedule+meals+at+regular+times%27&databases=2005%3B2004%3B&hview=2] story concerning the CATCH curriculum that’s being pushed by Harris County's Public Health and Environmental Services Department to get children eating healthier and exercising more. The curriculum is being tried out at Schmalz Elementary, a Katy ISD elementary school.
KISD implemented a “district wide wellness program that officials hope will help stunt obesity at the local level” last year (January 21, 2004). See Katy Times article “Katy ISD Program Takes Aim at Student Obesity.”
I’m sure some other program will be implemented along these same lines next year.
Actually, I’m growing a bit weary of programs that pay lip service to nutrition. It doesn’t even take a dietician with a Ph.D. to come up with balanced meals for children that don’t look gaggy when placed on a plastic serving tray. Any mother could do it.
It also doesn’t take hiring Lance Armstrong to come up with a physical fitness program to get kids out of their chairs and running around.
What it does take is some leadership by a school board that cares about the physical well-being of children.
I have to wonder what these programs that come down the Pike cost the taxpayers. Some of them may be “free” if they come from another governmental source, but CATCH sounds like it probably costs something.
According to the Chronicle, around 20% of Texas children are overweight. Actually, I would say that their parents are responsible for most of that excess weight because they let their children sit in front of a TV for too long every day. I also think that if children are overweight, that’s not any business of the public schools!
I was a bit appalled by the information that Schmalz third grade teachers “sent home forms for children to complete with their parents. For a week or so, they track what they eat and the physical activities they do together, such as walking. When the forms come back, teachers give points for eating certain foods and taking part in physical activities. A class totals its points, trying to be the third grade at Schmalz with the highest number.”
Does anyone besides me believe that what parents serve their children to eat and whether they go for a walk with them or not is any business of a public school and/or its teachers?
This questionnaire that must be filled out is just a good example of the social engineering that is going on in our schools that takes the place of academic endeavor.
If the public schools want to make children physically better off, they will address the common practice of limited recess time. Recess in this day and age is about a third the length it was when I was in elementary school. I recall that we got an hour off for lunch and recess twice a day. That worked off a lot of pent up energy, and teachers didn’t find themselves with a room full of wiggly children every day. The fresh air and exercise took care of the problem.
If there are obese eleventh and twelfth graders in the Katy schools, it’s probably because in January of 1997 when they were in elementary school, here’s what they had for lunch the week of the 13th: On Monday, Turkey fingers, steamed rice/gravy, cheesy broccoli and a fresh baked roll; on Tuesday, cheeseburger on a bun, spicy fries, a fresh vegetable choice, and pickles; on Wednesday, pepperoni pizza, seasoned green beans, Texas-size bread, and a fruit choice; on Thursday rotini/meatballs/sauce, mozzarella cheese, tossed salad/dressing, garlic bread and pineapple tidbits; on Friday, chicken patty sandwich, vegetable soup, crackers, seasonal fruit.
This week (October 3, 2005) they can have on Monday, popcorn chicken, tortilla cheese rolls w/salsa, glazed carrots, mashed potatoes/gravy, hot roll; on Tuesday, pepperoni pizza, chicken tenders, pan cheese pizza, baby carrots/Ranch Dip, breadstick, chilled pears; on Wednesday, cheeseburger, hamburger, meatless Italian pocket, tossed salad/dressing, Potato Starz, fresh fruit; on Thursday, chicken fajitas, tortilla cheese rolls, lettuce, tomato, cheese, cornbread, peach slices, on Friday, corndog, deli cheese sub, vegetable sticks, sun chips, mixed fruit.
I sure wouldn’t feed my kids that stuff. Looks like it’s pretty loaded with carbohydrates and fat to me. If this menu meets government standards, then I would say someone needs to look at the standards.
Whatever happened to just plain meat? or Jello? or vegetables besides corn?
That’s why I made, over twenty years of having kids in school, 4,320 sack lunches. I wouldn’t eat what they serve in our schools, and I didn’t want my kids to have to eat it either.
And yes, I fussed about the schools' cafeteria food while I was on the school board, but no one agreed with me that there was a problem.
|
|
Mary McGarr, Katy Citizen Watchdog$ |
|
Date: 10/03/2005 |
